高级检索
    熊小辉,白永健,铁永波,等,2024. 基于“天–空–地–深”方法的山区城镇地质灾害隐患判识:以四川省喜德县重点乡镇为例[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质,44(3):560−571. DOI: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2024.09001
    引用本文: 熊小辉,白永健,铁永波,等,2024. 基于“天–空–地–深”方法的山区城镇地质灾害隐患判识:以四川省喜德县重点乡镇为例[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质,44(3):560−571. DOI: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2024.09001
    XIONG X H,BAI Y J,TIE Y B,et al.,2024. Identification of potential geohazards in mountainous towns based on "Space-Air-Ground-Underground" approach: A case study of key towns in Xide County, Sichuan Province[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,44(3):560−571. DOI: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2024.09001
    Citation: XIONG X H,BAI Y J,TIE Y B,et al.,2024. Identification of potential geohazards in mountainous towns based on "Space-Air-Ground-Underground" approach: A case study of key towns in Xide County, Sichuan Province[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,44(3):560−571. DOI: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2024.09001

    基于“天–空–地–深”方法的山区城镇地质灾害隐患判识:以四川省喜德县重点乡镇为例

    Identification of potential geohazards in mountainous towns based on "Space-Air-Ground-Underground" approach: A case study of key towns in Xide County, Sichuan Province

    • 摘要: 为了更好地适应山区城镇地质灾害隐患精细识别的需求,实现中、小型以及高隐蔽性地灾隐患的有效判识,本次以川西南喜德县重点乡镇为例,综合采用了光学遥感、InSAR、无人机载LiDAR、地面精细调查、高密度电法等方法,从不同精度和角度对研究区系统开展了地质灾害隐患判识。结果表明,不同手段具有很好的互补性,综合识别效果较好,共识别地灾隐患80处,包括新增识别29处,此外,识别潜在危险源131处;孕灾条件差异制约着不同识别方法的有效性,其中光学遥感在研究区西北部构造变形强烈、坚硬岩组分布区具有更好的识别效果,无人机摄影测量配合地面斜坡详查及物探探查等手段更适合东部米市宽缓向斜红层分布区的地灾识别,机载LiDAR高清三维摄影对重点城镇后山斜坡普遍发育的“簸箕形”平面形态滑坡和“栎叶状”流域平面形态泥石流识别效果较好;易崩易滑工程地质岩组与顺向型斜坡结构的优势组合是研究区地灾孕育的关键,而深部物探对控灾结构面探查是地质灾害隐患判识的重要佐证。

       

      Abstract: In order to better meet the needs of geohazard identification in mountainous towns and effectively detect small-sized, medium-sized, and hidden geohazards, a case study was conducted in several typical towns in Xide County, southwest Sichuan. The study employed a comprehensive suite of techniques, including optical remote sensing, InSAR, LiDAR, detailed slope investigation, and high-density resistivity methods, to identify geohazards from various perspectives and levels of precision. The results show that these methods complement each other well and are effective in geohazard identification. A total of 80 occurrences of geohazards were identified, including 29 new identifications, along with 131 potential geohazard dangers. The differences in disaster-inducing factors in the study area constrain the effectiveness of different methods. Optical remote sensing proved more effective in areas characterized by strong structural deformation and hard rock formations. In contrast, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry, combined with detailed ground surveys and geophysical exploration, was more suitable for identifying geohazards in the red layer distribution areas of the Mishi wide gentle syncline. Airborne LiDAR high-definition 3D photography was particularly effective for identifying "dustpan-shaped" landslides and "oak leaf-shaped" debris flows, which are common on the slopes of key towns. The combination of easily collapsible and slidable engineering geological rock groups and dip-slope structures is the key to the formation of geohazards in the study area. Geophysical exploration targeting disaster-controlling structures is an important support for geohazard identification.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回